CursorHop

CursorHop vs Synergy

Synergy has been shipping for over a decade. The C++ daemon, the manual setup, and the connection-drop reputation have all been around about that long. CursorHop is what happens when you start over in Rust.

Median cursor latency
7.2 ms
vs 17 ms · Synergy
File transfer peak
70 Mbps
vs — Mbps · Synergy
Idle memory
18 MB
vs 62 MB · Synergy
First-time setup
< 1 min
vs ~ 8 min · Synergy

The honest read

Synergy is old. Old C++ codebase, multi-step setup that still wants hostnames and port configs, and a long public track record of connection drops on busy networks. Synergy 3 is a modernization of the UI, not the underlying architecture. It works — you'll feel the weight.

CursorHop started from the complaints Synergy users have been making for a decade. A Rust input pipeline at ~7 ms median latency. Noise encryption on every tier, not gated behind Pro. mDNS auto-discovery — no hostnames, no manual IPs. Native drag-drop file transfer at 70 Mbps. Setup in under a minute.

The one honest gap: Synergy supports Linux. CursorHop doesn't yet. If that's your deal-breaker, pick Synergy. For every other desk — Windows, macOS, or both — the trade isn't close.

What each one ships today

Apples to apples. No footnotes-on-footnotes.

Synergy CursorHop
Engine language C++ Rust (native, no GC)
Windows Yes Windows 10+
macOS Yes macOS 12+
Linux Yes Coming soon
Auto-discovery (mDNS) Partial (hostname / manual IP often needed) Full mDNS, zero config
Encryption default Available in paid tiers Noise, on in every tier
Clipboard — images Limited Text + images, every tier
File transfer (drag-drop) Not built in Native drag-drop over LAN
Screen dimming No Auto-dim inactive screens
Ctrl ⇄ Cmd translation Yes Yes, automatic
Pricing model Paid tiers, one-time From $10 one-time
Free trial Limited demo 7 days, full features, no card
Refund window Varies 14 days, no questions

Latency and throughput figures describe typical behavior on gigabit LAN with both machines on the same switch. Real-world numbers vary with Wi-Fi congestion and driver configuration. Claims about Synergy sourced from its public product pages, documentation, and user reports as of April 2026.

Pick Synergy if…

  • You need Linux support today.
  • You're provisioning 20+ seats and specifically need Synergy's team console.

Pick CursorHop if…

  • You use Windows, macOS, or both.
  • You want setup to finish in under a minute.
  • You want encryption on from the first install, not behind a paid tier.
  • You want native drag-drop file transfer and auto screen dimming out of the box.
  • You want a Rust daemon that doesn't hitch under load.

Quick answers

Is CursorHop faster than Synergy?

In our internal LAN tests CursorHop's Rust input pipeline holds a median cursor latency around 7 ms on gigabit. Synergy 3 typically lands in the 15-20 ms range and historically suffers from connection stutters on busy networks — a common complaint in user reviews.

Does CursorHop support Linux?

Not yet. CursorHop currently supports Windows 10+ and macOS 12+. Linux support is planned for a future release. If you need Linux today, Synergy is a valid option.

How does pricing compare?

CursorHop is a one-time purchase starting at $10 for Pro (2 devices). Synergy 3 also uses one-time pricing with tiered Basic and Pro licenses. Both are pay-once — no subscriptions.

Is CursorHop encrypted?

Yes. Every tier — including the 7-day free trial — encrypts all traffic using the Noise protocol. Keystrokes, clipboard, and file transfers are protected in transit.

Can I import my Synergy config?

No direct config import — Synergy's layout format is proprietary. CursorHop's layout editor rebuilds most multi-monitor setups in under a minute, and auto-discovery handles networking for you.

Try the Rust-powered alternative.

7-day free trial. No credit card. Full feature set.

Synergy® is a registered trademark of Symless Ltd. CursorHop is an independent product and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the aforementioned. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Comparison based on publicly available information as of April 2026.